Like a lot of my classmates have said, AE 410 was like no
other class I have taken at Drexel. It covered topics I was only briefly
introduced to and allowed me to explore them further. The class was interesting
and relevant to my major without being computation based. Though geared towards
the digital building concentration, I still found it helpful as a mechanical
concentration—especially with the discussion of sensors and BAS. Spending
several weeks talking about topics allowed for a well-rounded discussion of
them. The class structure allowed you to
learn a lot about the subjects, present what you’d learned, and discuss with
your classmates. I liked that we had time to discuss with our groups and work
with others for the final project. It’d made the class more interactive and
expanded my knowledge by using my classmates as resources.
The discussion of robots and AI was something I had only
briefly learned about. Though incredibly interesting, I also find it worrisome.
Robots and AI are such a powerful tool and we need to be cautious with how we
use it. Though I already used Revit and other BIM software in other classes and
at co-op, I had no experience with databases. That portion of the class was
entirely new to me and gave me a perspective as to how they work and where they
would be useful. With both BIM and databases, the class gave everyone a basic
understanding that could be transferred into our classroom and other future
experiences.
Not only is Professor Mitchell a wealth of knowledge,
bringing in guest presenters to show their experiences with the topics was also
helpful. It was cool to hear how this software impacts their jobs and where
they see the future of the technology going. One point that I saw as a theme in
the class is that this technology is ever-changing and that we need to be
prepared to learn with those changes. Keeping that idea in mind while finishing
up at Drexel and moving on to a career will be critical. Though the powers of
Revit and BIM in general are amazing, it’s only a quick stop in the timeline of
the technology—it will continue to expand in capabilities and user
understanding.
Overall, I learned a lot in the class and looked at topics I
was not familiar with. I was able to connect with my classmates through
discussions and use them as resources in understanding what we were learning
about the technology and the application of them. I initially took the class to
check off part of the professional elective requirement, but ended up seeing
how relevant it is in the design and construction fields today.
COMMENTS:
Allison Abad:
I agree that this class was a nice break from the computation-based
classes we usually see as engineers, it was a nice way to see a different
aspect of the field and hear from people already in the industry. Like you, the
database was a challenge for me but was practical for our majors. The class was
geared towards digital building concentrations, but it was still interesting
and insightful as a mechanical concentration.
Brad DiGiovanni:
I agree that the class schedule was nice—we were able to
take a couple weeks to dive into each topic. Prof. Mitchell is very
knowledgeable in these topics and did a great job of spreading that knowledge
to us. I agree that the class did open our minds to the ever-changing
technology of our society, though it worries me. We must embrace the changes or
be left behind, but if technology goes too far, we could be in trouble.
Lauren Kujawa:
Like you, I’m unsure how often I will use the database knowledge
we learned in this class, but all the topics we discussed were interesting and
could become relevant to our jobs as time progresses. Andrew and I also wrote
our paper on the differences between green and intelligent buildings. I also
have learned about green buildings from other classes so seeing the intelligent
building side was a positive change.