This blog post starts with my expression about next topic discussed throughout
this week. I believe BIM would become an integral part for my future career, as
many of BIM applications have been subscripted by AEC firms recently. Moreover,
at my first Co-Op with the city, we had to delay our construction process when
a design change was accepted. In fact, if a BIM model of the pipe connection
was created, construction could seamlessly continue instead of waiting for 2-weeks
due to re-investigating and re-evaluating of the old design. However, I have neither
experience nor knowledge about BIM before enrolling in the class, which has
haunted me since transferring to Drexel. My blog post may contain ambiguous statements,
and I am waiting for our lecture next Tuesday for discussion about BIM.
The first part of Chapter 2: “BIM Design Tools and Parametric Modeling”
discussed about the development of object-based parametric modeling. Several researches
were conducted to generate three-dimensional model during 1960s. After the
introduction of solid modeling in 1973, two modelling techniques has been competed
for years: Boundary representation (B-rep) approach and Constructive Solid
Geometry (CSG) approach. The first technique developed an object through
operations and object arguments, when the second one applied algebraic expressions
to define object. Contemporary parametric modeling has been established after
the combination of both techniques, as the CSG-like tool acts as a database to
create a visual model in the B-rep tool. Frankly, although it is boring to read,
the development of object-based parametric modeling established a solid
foundation for further techniques that could not be applied until computing power
would handle highly complex models.
The development of object-based parametric modeling tools inspired basic
capillaries of BIM design applications, which can currently handle more capabilities
than a basic 3-D object designing tool (as SketchUp). By involving with different
uses, BIM design applications must split into three distinct way to describe: a
tool, a platform, and an environment. For instances, BIM environment applications
can utilize tools within the application for crafting and managing design database
(In other terms, “libraries of objects”). Moreover, most BIM platforms can perform
other engineering or management tasks such as structural analysis, energy
analysis, rendering, and cost estimating, etc.… through add-ons interfaces. In
short, BIM provides a faster, more precise, and affordable option to design,
build, and manage a project.
Revit platform was introduced as current market leader for BIM in
architectural design by the authors. It is still a best-known BIM platform in
the building construction, since Revit has been listed as either required or
recommended skills for design jobs. Being an Autodesk product, Revit users can
access to Autodesk-provided library (SEEK) for object specification. Also, many
vendors create libraries of their products for Revit platform, which supports a
big list of file types: RVA, DWG, DWF, DGN, GSM, SKP, IES... Moreover, due to
its dominant market position, many add-ons and softwares in diverse sector
under civil engineering umbrella have been associated with Revit including
structural (STAAD), mechanical (MagiCAD), energy (EnergyPlus), rendering (3D
Max), facility management, site analysis (Civil 3D). However, it can only
process smoothly for projects lower than 300 MB, and provides limited support
for complex structures.
Source:
C.M. Eastman. "Chapter 2: BIM Design Tools and Parametric Modeling" in BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors, 2nd ed., Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2012 pp.31-97.
Comments:
Kerry,
Thank you for summarizing the long chapter into 3 paragraphs, which I was used as a guideline to skim through 66 pages of dry writing. I believe Revit has changed drastically than at the time this book was published, and additional options have been added. Similar to Zac comments from above, it is essential for a large multisector company to open a BIM-related modeling department to fully understand about the software as well as the technology
Dee Dee,
Thank you for sharing your Co-Op and Revit experience at your blog post. I really wonder about the central model function of Revit. It is really cool to design models of structural system or MEP system without depending on Architect's model. Also, I am curious what would happen if the architect decide to change a design? Otherwise, it is really cool to know that Revit MEP has developed add-ons for air duct sizing.
Thomas,
A company that can control the interoperability between BIM and its add-ons becomes a winner in this competition. I agree with you on your concern about Autodesk's domination on BIM software, as it is currently the only software company could be able to create Revit-friendly add-ons to fulfill the seamless transition of a model between every software. Collaborations between multiple companies to create a public BIM tools to transfer models between software are good, but then it might lead to an interest group of these companies controlling BIM industry because there is no such thing as a free lunch.
Source:
C.M. Eastman. "Chapter 2: BIM Design Tools and Parametric Modeling" in BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors, 2nd ed., Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2012 pp.31-97.
Comments:
Kerry,
Thank you for summarizing the long chapter into 3 paragraphs, which I was used as a guideline to skim through 66 pages of dry writing. I believe Revit has changed drastically than at the time this book was published, and additional options have been added. Similar to Zac comments from above, it is essential for a large multisector company to open a BIM-related modeling department to fully understand about the software as well as the technology
Dee Dee,
Thank you for sharing your Co-Op and Revit experience at your blog post. I really wonder about the central model function of Revit. It is really cool to design models of structural system or MEP system without depending on Architect's model. Also, I am curious what would happen if the architect decide to change a design? Otherwise, it is really cool to know that Revit MEP has developed add-ons for air duct sizing.
Thomas,
A company that can control the interoperability between BIM and its add-ons becomes a winner in this competition. I agree with you on your concern about Autodesk's domination on BIM software, as it is currently the only software company could be able to create Revit-friendly add-ons to fulfill the seamless transition of a model between every software. Collaborations between multiple companies to create a public BIM tools to transfer models between software are good, but then it might lead to an interest group of these companies controlling BIM industry because there is no such thing as a free lunch.
Dung,
ReplyDeleteThanks for your post. You did a good job summarizing the chapter to few paragraphs. I agree that the BIM tools provide faster and precise option in design and manage a project. But as you mention, the Revit has dominant the market for BIM tools. I think this might cause problems. If a firm use other BIM tools that is not associated with Revit, the data and model transferring will be a problem.
Dung,
ReplyDeleteIt was interesting to read your summary on chapter 2 for BIM: Design Tools and Parametric Modeling; In fact, by elaborating on the origin of BIM and the multiple codes and research conducted for the creation of complete building information modeling gives a different prospective on the matter. In addition, the inclusion of your coop experience in relation to BIM was certainly convincing.
Dung,
ReplyDeleteI read your post just to see what you took away from Chapter 2. I too had the same chapter assignment. I'm glad that you focused on the actual application of BIM program and elaborated on Revit. It's nice to know that Revit or AutoDesk are starting to compile these gigantic libraries that will allow most of their various softwares to be able to communicate with one another. This was an issue at my first co-op where I used Microstation, Bentley while PWD and Philadelphia Streets used AutoCAD. Converting one file to the next is not impossible but it sure is a tedious and inefficient task. So I for one, am happy to see that we are making great advances in this sector.
Dung,
ReplyDeleteI appreciate your candor on the matter, particularly pertaining to feeling haunted by many school not offering guidance with this software, especially Drexel of all. This is a clear gap in knowledge that our graduating class will certainly be penalized for. Knowing more about the company and its origin is a helpful start to the process.