The
traditional style in which contractors went about estimating and then building
a particular building was off of a classic 2D building plan set. This plan set
included the civil, MEP, structural, etc., drawings to complete the building. A
General Contractor would get those plans and divide them up and send them out
to their subcontractors. This process takes a while and in the end many issues
with fitment of mechanical systems or other systems crossing each other in the
wrong manner will occur especially in a very large building. This causes change
orders to be sent to the GC and eventually the owner because it costs money to
fix these issues. This also causes the schedule to get behind and set the
completion date of the building back further than it probably already is by the
time some of these subcontractors are on site.
Everything
I just spoke of could be avoided and many companies are switching to BIM to try
and avoid the issues. The idea of a BIM program is to be able to take those 2D
drawings the engineers produce and create a 3D model which the owner and
contractors can look at and walk through. This helps the owner visually see
what their building will look like allowing them to change what they don’t like
before they see it physically in the building. While, at the same time allow
the general contractor to voice their concerns or possible issues with
constructing this building before they come up in the construction phase. What
a BIM program like Revit allows the contractor to do is to find all the
problems, clash detections, before the building is even constructed. This eliminates
the need for change orders saving the owner both time and money. The more
detailed the contractor can make the model the less surprises there will be in
the field. Another benefit to using a BIM program is the ability some of them
have to aid in the takeoff and eventual estimate of cost for the project. The
contractor needs to put an estimate together and if the program they are using
can do all the takeoff, clash detection, some calculations, and more it will
only make the estimate more accurate. In turn, the more accurate the estimate
is the more money the contractor could stand to make, and the more jobs they
will win because they are not over-estimating or under-estimating.
Another
consideration that could be made with using a BIM program to build and estimate
the job is that you could possibly implement a process of Lean Construction.
The construction industry is the most wasteful industry for many reasons like
over estimation of materials needed, not properly storing materials so they get
damaged, and an overall culture that has been engrained in the minds of many
project managers, superintendents, and laborers. What lean construction aims to
do is lessen the amount of waste by upwards of 90%. This therefore allows the
contractor to make more money on the job all because they may have budgeted to
use more material or they were able to win the job with a higher profit margin
due to the reduced direct cost. This type of construction also lends itself to
tight urban environments, because the contractor does not have a large space to
store materials for the next month’s work.
Reading
C. M. Eastman, “Chapter 6: BIM for Contractors,”
in BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners,
Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors, 2nd ed., Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2011, pp. 263-304.
COMMENTS:
Mark Odorizzi
Mark Odorizzi
You had made some interesting points and I believe you are
right in that our generation will be the
one to fully embrace Revit. I believe
that if the industry in general moves to this type of 3D design
that it will
only make the construction process move quicker. There will be less issues and
change
orders if a building is designed in Revit (BIM Program). Also, the need
to print as many 2D plans
will be lessened, since superintendents will carry an
iPad around with the BIM model on it instead of
a stack of rolled up plans. I
believe this will make the construction of a building more accurate and at
the
same time easier because the super will be able to show a laborer what it
should look like in 3D
instead of trying to explain it to them from a 2D plan.
The building delivered should also match what
the client or owner envisioned much
better.
Dee Dee Strohl
You bring up a very useful property Revit has. I did not
know that Revit had the ability to be worked
on simultaneously and updated in
real time. This, like you had mentioned, allows the various
engineers and architects
to alter things at the same time and not have to a few weeks later learn that
everything they were designing for is completely wrong because the architect
moved a major
structural wall you were counting on using to run the duct work.
Revit let’s all the disciplines know at
the same time, allowing them to adjust
and speed up the overall design process. Which, since I
worked in the
construction industry, this would limit and drastically reduce the conflicts
and the
construct-ability issues certain designs have. Overall, I believe and
have seen some evidence for the
fact that with BIM the overall design and
construction process will be much quicker.
Kerry Milligan
Obviously BIM programs have many upsides to them. These
programs are taking over the design and
construction industry very rapidly because
of the abilities they have. There are a few issues with them
though, the
biggest being the learning curve involved to actually understand and know all
of the
capabilities one of these programs like Revit has. As you had said this
is probably one of the biggest
drawbacks, which is probably why many
construction companies that I know of are creating new
departments to simply
deal with 3D modeling. Even civil construction companies are modeling
bridges
that you see on the turnpike so that their laborers know what it should look
like or how they
may go about constructing something. By dedicating a
department with two or three modelers in it,
they can focus simply on creating
the model and bettering their abilities in the program.
Zac,
ReplyDeleteI almost completely forgot about the estimation side of BIM when writing my post on Interoperability. I don't have very much experience on the construction management and contractor side of BIM, so you bring up some very good points about the potential cost sink that the old method creates. My question now would be could the programs not do all of the cost estimation based off of the 3D model, rather than have someone look at it. Everything is defined in the model. Every piece, material volumes, plumbing, etc. What purpose do you think the subcontractors would serve in the estimation side if such programs were to be implemented, if they haven't been already?
BIM for Contractors
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, parties involved in a project as you mentioned such as general contracts abuse the idea of change of orders just to make more profit out of a project, and unfortunately many companies are still not proficient and lack understanding the Capabilities of BIM tools, which leading me to believe an IPD would be the best case scenario to adopt as a traditional process for projects.