CHAPTER 2: BIM DESIGN TOOLS AND PARAMETRIC MODELING
This chapter basically talks about the origins of 3D Tools
and Modeling and its evolution (specifically BIM and parametric), technical
methods of how Parametric Modeling works and a few example softwares that dominate
the 3D Modeling field. I will be focusing on its origin and evolution.
Early 3D Modeling
In early 3D designing/drafting, there were two prominent
methods of solid drawing – Boundary Representation (B-rep) approach and Constructive
Solid Geometry (CSG). B-rep uses shapes as bounded surfaces to form solids and
featured Boolean operations to modify drawn solids. CSG represents a shape as a
set of functions and uses a similar method but without the need to create
bounded surfaces. To simplify, the main difference is that CSG uses algebraic formula
to define a shape while B-rep stores the result of defining operations and objects.
Therefore, CSG solids can be easily edited while B-rep is more suitable for
direct interaction. The next step of evolution was from CAD to parametric
modeling. This allowed the drawing to adjust accordingly when an edit is made. What
this means is that, after the user initially designs/draws an object, any new
changes made to the object such as reducing a length or removing a portion of
the drawn solid, the parametric model will be able to automatically generate a
new solid without the user having to make the necessary adjustments to the
initial edit.
Parametric Design/Modeling
Typically, there are 3 degrees of parametric modeling: simple,
minor & major improvement. Simple just requires defining shapes or
assemblies with parameters. Minor improvement adds more detail to the defining
stage so as the drawn solid would automatically update when the predefined
shape’s parameters are changed. Finally, a major improvement adds a greater
level of detail that lets a drawn solid interact/communicate with another drawn
solid’s parameters. The common uses of parametric modeling discussed are for
buildings and construction.
There are two types of objects drawn - pre-defined base that
has various object “families” typically used in BIM Architectural Design
Applications and built-in features to draw. An example drawing of a precast
fabrication-level architectural façade can be seen below.
User-Defined Parametric Object Anomalies
There will always be a case where a very customized drawing
is desired. Such a situation is outside of the not just the pre-defined objects
but also outside of the capability to be drawn using the provided tools. When
such as case occurs the primary method of solving it is to draw it in another system
and importing it. An alternative is to use solid modeling geometry and assign
attributes manually.
Summary
COMMENTS:
Dung Tran:
I read your post just to see what you took away from Chapter 2. I too had the same chapter assignment. I'm glad that you focused on the actual application of BIM program and elaborated on Revit. It's nice to know that Revit or AutoDesk are starting to compile these gigantic libraries that will allow most of their various softwares to be able to communicate with one another. This was an issue at my first co-op where I used Microstation, Bentley while PWD and Philadelphia Streets used AutoCAD. Converting one file to the next is not impossible but it sure is a tedious and inefficient task. So I for one, am happy to see that we are making great advances in this sector.
Andrew Maita:
It was very informative to read your post as I had no clue what interoperability meant. I think you did a great job at explaining it in as much not technical terms as possible. The idea of it is great and I can see why all these drafting applications are trying to incorporate this feature into their systems. I guess the main issue at hand would be how to update old softwares that do not read different types of files that is new to it. This sounds like a cumbersome task where redesigning the whole software might even seem easier.
Source: BIM Handbook : A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors by Eastman, Charles M. 2nd Edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 2011
It was very informative to read your post as I had no clue what interoperability meant. I think you did a great job at explaining it in as much not technical terms as possible. The idea of it is great and I can see why all these drafting applications are trying to incorporate this feature into their systems. I guess the main issue at hand would be how to update old softwares that do not read different types of files that is new to it. This sounds like a cumbersome task where redesigning the whole software might even seem easier.
Source: BIM Handbook : A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors by Eastman, Charles M. 2nd Edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 2011
Thank you for concentrating on the history of this chapter. I as well reached the same conclusions you did about CAD being a bit more "rugged" as compared to BIM, especially after reading the chapter. I think it is very interesting that although BIM is more widely used that it is not taught as often as CAD like programs.
ReplyDelete